I originally wrote this a
number of years back and it was posted on a friends website. Last year the
website closed down so I thought it about time that I posted this up on my blog
to give a glimpse into how I see collecting. I have had a fair amount of
feedback over the years to this short essay and hope it is at the very least an
interesting read.
ON COLLECTING
Why collect, why indeed! Is
the presence of beauty and a “well made” object not enough of a reason? The
honest truth in my mind, is the fact that I do not collect anything. This is
not a mere exercise in semantics or some escapist clause looking to avoid the
label of “materialist”. Rather I believe that my lifestyle is a dramatic and
obligating choice to live with and around handmade or created objects. This choice involves me in the daily
interaction from this “things”, feeding off their inspiration, the care and
curatorial duties that maintain them and the ongoing study of the history,
context and creation of the “well made”.
From the time I was 16 and handled my first Michael Price
California Dirk and began to decipher the mysteries of the Japanese Sword, I
made a choice to have a personal space, an environment, that I could have a
degree of control over. A personal space began to define itself as one, which
allowed me an uninterrupted moment of calm, as well as being able to give me
inspiration and clarity. This choice created a space that fostered a dialogue
that I continue to strive for today. To this end most people label me a
collector, this looses site of a path my wife and I have embarked. A way of
living, into which we can retreat, a sanctuary of handmade objects from which
we can replenish and nourish our spirit.
For over 20 years I have made a conscious choice to own
little, but to live with objects we find to have a sense of import or
consequence. Our house is the only controllable environment that we have, and
we strive to create a sanctuary from many of the worlds harsher realities as
well as the stress and pressures of daily living. Within our home and it’s few
pieces of handmade furniture, prints, painting, pottery and metalwork, we are
managing a space that allows us brief moments of tranquility and clarity. The
passion for living this way, in and around objects we see as beauty, has become
our reward and personal connection to the works and talents of many inspired
artisans, both living and dead, with whom we may have an ongoing and rich
dialogue.
“The question, is not what you look at, but what do you
see?”, this quote by Henry David Thoreau crystallizes my belief in the constant
dialogue between object and viewer. “Good work” is first and foremost about
this dialogue. The primary dialogue takes place between the maker and his
artwork; the secondary dialogue is between the object and the viewer. In an
object that qualifies as “well made” the dialogue moves through the maker, into
the object, and to the viewer in a manner that can not be explained, only felt.
It is like standing in front of Monet’s Waterlilly paintings or other
masterpieces, the message, though at many differing levels, is understood by
all who come in contact with them. It is in my mind, probably this dynamic that
defines the object and all other objects that are of a like nature.
It is this dialogue, a very personal and often solitary
experience that has forced me to live the way that I do. In this dialogue, I am
able to place an object within an aesthetic context, but also a personal one
within my own environment along with my interests and experiences from music
and film to food, drink and literature. By creating this dialogue, I can also
help decide how I live, influencing moods, pursuits and my personal creativity
in my pottery and paintings.
Choosing things to live with is a very personal and
rarely objective experience. I am guilty of responding to objects that I
perceive as “well made”, and consequently in time the level of dialogue I can
have with them is diminished. These were the wrong choices, things that I
become complacent with or bored of. Things to look for should be a constant
source of information and emotion. Over time and exposure to new experience the
greater the dialogue with a “well made” object becomes. At 20 and now at 40, my
ability to maintain a meaningful and rewarding dialogue with arts and crafts
has changed and matured. A knife, sword or other object owned at 20 can not
maintain this level of dialogue a piece acquired at 40 would take. Today
decisions are made slower, even though an object may speak to me immediately.
With time my ability to see within the object, beyond its technical
craftsmanship, into its nature to transcend mere formality and function, has
developed and with new experiences will hopefully continue to do so. Today the
works I am looking to live with reach beyond a high level of craftsmanship and
artistry, looking to push beyond the conventional and add to the field rather
than simply rely on those things, which have come before it.
Most objects that I respond to now are stripped of the
superfluous, and stand firmly on the beauty of a distilled line. These objects,
whether chair or sword, reach for that indefinable “something” well beyond the
concept of function, existing form and the preconceived limitations of
contemporary materials. Contemporary damascus and modern studio furniture are
good examples of this new aesthetic.
The qualities of a “well made” object are subtle.
Inherently they possess a mastery or near mastery of the material, process and
art of the particular pursuit. The simpler a “well made” object is, the more
complex its definition becomes. Artists and craftsman after this “well made”
work, after gaining a level of technical virtuosity, strip away these binding
issues and in the conscious and unconscious mind, struggle with the greater
concepts of contributing to the art, context and the act of creation. When all
works well, as dained by the gods, the luck of planetary alignment or some
other act of serendipity, an object is born that bares it’s presence or spirit.
I have encountered things, such as a Japanese teabowl of the 16th
century, which had enough presence to fill a large gallery space. For this
reason, museums carefully arrange their spaces to avoid overwhelming their
guest and burning them out. When these pieces are created, I believe a certain
amount of the creative spontaneity and tension is captured within the work
suspending a moment of the creation.
Spirited and empowered works, somehow possess a spark
that captivates those who come in contact with it. It is in this way that the
viewer and viewed share a dialogue, a moment, that unfolds or unravels the
nature and intent of the object. It is through a sensitivity of concept, form,
material and process borne of humble and noble materials alike, which
establishes the criterion by which an art/ craft is defined and driven.
Likewise those sensitive enough to perceive these subtitles are able to enter
into a lifelong dialogue with the works. Irrespective of whether or not they
own the work in question. “Well made” objects somehow contain an ability to
open themselves and share their inner beauty, meaning and complexities with
those sensitive enough, and receptive enough to initiate, maintain, and
continue a dialogue.
Through the internalizing process of creation and sharing
the created, both craftsman/ artist and collector are plunged into a moment
that shares not only the present object, but also its foundation in the past,
it’s context and presence in the moment and it’s vital role in pushing the art
into the future. A “well made” object maintains this interest and dialogue. The
dialogue is continuous and continues to develop over time. These objects
constantly reveal themselves, the longer they are lived with and around. In
time you think you know all the nuances of a piece, yet you are constantly made
aware that there are things you discover with each encounter. By bringing new experiences
to the table, as you grow, your perception of the details change and your
insights become more acute. Every day a new dialogue emerges, this work is
never boring. A good piece, "well
made”, will always meet your aesthetic and emotional needs.
So, why collect, this is the personal, individual
responsibility that needs to be answered. There are many reasons and
definitions for collecting or living with art and craft. In my nearly three
decades of “collecting”, I have found that the dialogue, curatorial responsibilities and a need to
research and define an object’s context, have driven me into the esoterica of
metal, clay and ink. I believe that this pathway has lead me to a more
insightful and complete relationship with my environment and hopefully in time
will help me become not only a better craftsman, but a more thoughtful and
responsible “collector”.