Monday, February 5, 2024

RARE?

RARE /rer/ not found in large numbers and consequently of interest or value; unusually good or remarkable 

 A lot of people end up using the term, "rare" when describing object to infer monentary value or aesthertic or cultural value and over the years I have wondered how often the term actually applies. I am in no way inferring that I somehow have the monopoly of what is or is not rare but rare is not defined as an object that is just rarely observed or come in contact with. I believe there is more to the word, beyond unusual, not typical or other descriptive terms, it has to be something that is uncommon, out of an artists or craftsman normal ouvre of being of such a incredible example that it deserves such a moniker. I will start by saying that I am not sure if this simple Shino chawan is rare or not simply because it is the only one I have ever seen but rather it is not at all typical of the potter who made it. 

This simple Shino chawan was thrown out of a dense, white Shigaraki clay and glazed in Shino prior to firing, the bowl was glazed and fired at Toyozo Arakawa's kiln and fired in a sagger. As for the potter, this was made by Shigaraki pioneer, Takahashi Rakusai III sometime in the late 1950s or early 1960s. The form of the chawan is not exactly typical of the potter and the glaze and simple XXX design around the top portion of the bowl is not something you would encounter on a normal day strolling into Rakusai's studio. This chawan was made and fired at a time when some of the most important potters of the day where sharing ideas and space in their kilns to the effect of seeing Bizen, Shigaraki and Karatsu pots by Arakawa and other combinations by potters like Rakusai III and Kaneshige Toyo making for a rather fertile exchange of traditions leading to this possibly rare Shino chawan that is certainly outside of the tradition that the potter is certainly best known for and connected to the heart of Shigaraki. 

 I should apologize for the quality of the photo as well, this was taken nearly 20 years ago using a digital camera when they were in their infancy and it has been converted from an old discette to jpeg after jpeg and this is what I have ended up with. I don't have the option to rephotograph this pot so as they say, it is what it is.